aels wrote:I have been reading some of the coverage on Jezebel and Gawker and the overriding consensus has been 'Ahahahaha, this fuckin' ninny'. So I don't think he pwned shit, unless someone who watched the debate says otherwise.
Corruption and transparency:
When you don't like corruption, pork spending, government BS, you tend to have two choices, vote for the one who takes the bribes, assigns the spending and writes the laws; or you can chose the guy who is paying the bribes, has to deal with government inneficiency (while being forced to pay for it), and does not have incentive to keep the status quo.
Logically you would vote for the second one.
Does that mean all would change? No, but as opposed to the first choice, this one actually has a chance to fix crap.
What does this mean? That trump supporters when it comes to economics and government finances are more logical than say Hillary or Jeb Bush voters.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests